↓ Skip to main content

Fascism and Populism: Are They Useful Categories for Comparative Sociological Analysis?

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Sociology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fascism and Populism: Are They Useful Categories for Comparative Sociological Analysis?
Published in
Annual Review of Sociology, May 2019
DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022351
Authors

Mabel Berezin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#498,846
of 12,986,095 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Sociology
#57
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,905
of 180,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,986,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them