You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary parallelisms of pectoral and pelvic network-anatomy from fins to limbs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aau7459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Borja Esteve-Altava, Stephanie E. Pierce, Julia L. Molnar, Peter Johnston, Rui Diogo, John R. Hutchinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 28 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 39% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#448,935
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#3,253
of 12,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,661
of 365,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#62
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.