↓ Skip to main content

Health Effects of Household Solid Fuel Use: Findings from 11 Countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology Study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health Perspectives, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Effects of Household Solid Fuel Use: Findings from 11 Countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology Study
Published in
Environmental Health Perspectives, May 2019
DOI 10.1289/ehp3915
Pubmed ID
Authors

Perry Hystad, MyLinh Duong, Michael Brauer, Andrew Larkin, Raphael Arku, Om P. Kurmi, Wen Qi Fan, Alvaro Avezum, Igbal Azam, Jephat Chifamba, Antonio Dans, Johan L. du Plessis, Rajeev Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Fernando Lanas, Zhiguang Liu, Yin Lu, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Prem Mony, Viswanathan Mohan, Deepa Mohan, Sanjeev Nair, Thandi Puoane, Omar Rahman, Ah Tse Lap, Yanga Wang, Li Wei, Karen Yeates, Sumathy Rangarajan, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf, [on behalf of Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological Study investigators]

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 105 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Environmental Science 18 6%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 122 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,489,675
of 25,990,981 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health Perspectives
#614
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,526
of 367,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health Perspectives
#30
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.