You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ETE 3: Reconstruction, Analysis, and Visualization of Phylogenomic Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biology and Evolution, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/molbev/msw046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaime Huerta-Cepas, François Serra, Peer Bork |
| Abstract |
The Environment for Tree Exploration (ETE) is a computational framework that simplifies the reconstruction, analysis and visualization of phylogenetic trees and multiple sequence alignments. Here we present ETE v3, featuring numerous improvements in the underlying library of methods, and providing a novel set of standalone tools to perform common tasks in comparative genomics and phylogenetics. The new features include i) building gene-based and supermatrix-based phylogenies using a single command, ii) testing and visualizing evolutionary models, iii) calculating distances between trees of different size or including duplications, and iv) providing seamless integration with the NCBI taxonomy database. ETE is freely available at http://etetoolkit.org. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 28% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 26 | 72% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 28% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 983 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 952 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 213 | 22% |
| Researcher | 186 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 124 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 116 | 12% |
| Unknown | 178 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 309 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 284 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 40 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 8% |
| Unknown | 229 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#815,484
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#336
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,482
of 302,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#13
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.