↓ Skip to main content

Clinical characteristics of patients assessed within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service: results from a naturalistic cohort study (Predicting Outcome Following…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical characteristics of patients assessed within an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service: results from a naturalistic cohort study (Predicting Outcome Following Psychological Therapy; PROMPT)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0736-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilay Hepgul, Sinead King, Myanthi Amarasinghe, Gerome Breen, Nina Grant, Nick Grey, Matthew Hotopf, Paul Moran, Carmine M. Pariante, André Tylee, Janet Wingrove, Allan H. Young, Anthony J. Cleare

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 206 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 61 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 68 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,106,746
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#312
of 5,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,371
of 315,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#6
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.