↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota of the Human Body

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: How to Manipulate the Microbiota: Prebiotics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
How to Manipulate the Microbiota: Prebiotics
Chapter number 9
Book title
Microbiota of the Human Body
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-931246-0, 978-3-31-931248-4
Authors

Petra Louis, Harry J. Flint, Catherine Michel, Louis, Petra, Flint, Harry J, Michel, Catherine

Editors

Andreas Schwiertz

Abstract

During the last century, human nutrition has evolved from the definition of our nutritional needs and the identification of ways to meet them, to the identification of food components that can optimise our physiological and psychological functions. This development, which aims to ensure the welfare, health and reduced susceptibility to disease during life, gave birth to the concept of "functional foods". In this context, there is an increasing interest in the physiological effects induced by the dense and diverse microbiota which inhabits the human colon and whose development depends on the fermentation of undigested food residues. Thus, much research aims at identifying ways to guide these impacts in order to benefit the health of the host. It is in this context that the concept of "prebiotics" was developed in the 1990s. Since then, prebiotics have stimulated extensive work in order to clarify their definition, their nature and their physiological properties in accordance with the evolution of knowledge on the intestinal microbiota. However many questions remain open about their specificities, their mechanism(s) of action and therefore the relevance of their current categorisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 159 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 61 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,188,008
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,090
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,178
of 304,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.