↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and functional foods

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise and functional foods
Published in
Nutrition Journal, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-5-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wataru Aoi, Yuji Naito, Toshikazu Yoshikawa

Abstract

Appropriate nutrition is an essential prerequisite for effective improvement of athletic performance, conditioning, recovery from fatigue after exercise, and avoidance of injury. Nutritional supplements containing carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and minerals have been widely used in various sporting fields to provide a boost to the recommended daily allowance. In addition, several natural food components have been found to show physiological effects, and some of them are considered to be useful for promoting exercise performance or for prevention of injury. However, these foods should only be used when there is clear scientific evidence and with understanding of the physiological changes caused by exercise. This article describes various "functional foods" that have been reported to be effective for improving exercise performance or health promotion, along with the relevant physiological changes that occur during exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 205 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 23%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 19%
Sports and Recreations 39 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,802,694
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#599
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,958
of 64,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.