↓ Skip to main content

Austeridad y privatización sanitaria en época de crisis: ¿existen diferencias entre las comunidades autónomas?

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Austeridad y privatización sanitaria en época de crisis: ¿existen diferencias entre las comunidades autónomas?
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amaia Bacigalupe, Unai Martín, Raquel Font, Yolanda González-Rábago, Noemi Bergantiños

Abstract

To analyse the differences between autonomous communities in Spain according to their policies of austerity and healthcare privatization during the economic crisis. Changes in the application of legal reforms, healthcare privatization and healthcare financing/resources in the autonomous communities were analysed, and a summary indicator of each dimension was constructed. The Basque Country showed the clearest behaviour towards a weak policy of austerity and privatization, as opposed to La Rioja, Madrid, and the Balearic Islands. The three classifications will enable analysis of the mediating effect of policies of austerity and privatization in the relationship between the economic crisis and health in the Spanish context.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 3%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Professor 8 8%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 15%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 15 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,379,633
of 18,025,039 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#75
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,477
of 272,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,025,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.