↓ Skip to main content

Vulnerability Assessment of a Port and Harbor Community to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: Integrating Technical Expert and Stakeholder Input

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards Review, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vulnerability Assessment of a Port and Harbor Community to Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: Integrating Technical Expert and Stakeholder Input
Published in
Natural Hazards Review, November 2002
DOI 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2002)3:4(148)
Authors

Nathan J. Wood, James W. Good, Robert F. Goodwin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 19%
Social Sciences 6 16%
Environmental Science 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,747,051
of 7,325,869 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards Review
#29
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,363
of 282,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,325,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 62nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.