↓ Skip to main content

Posttraumatische Wachstumsstörung nach kindlichen distalen Radiusfrakturen mit Entwicklung einer Ulnalängenvarianz

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Posttraumatische Wachstumsstörung nach kindlichen distalen Radiusfrakturen mit Entwicklung einer Ulnalängenvarianz
Published in
Die Orthopädie, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00132-019-03741-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Wolf, K. Da Fonseca

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Psychology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 9 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,098
of 364,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.