You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emili Balaguer-Ballester, Christopher C. Lapish, Jeremy K. Seamans, Daniel Durstewitz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 168 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 33% |
| Researcher | 49 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 21% |
| Psychology | 20 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,808,841
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,783
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,835
of 124,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#42
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.