↓ Skip to main content

Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
123 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?
Published in
Anesthesiology, July 2019
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000002731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth C. Williams, Gabriel C. Motta-Ribeiro, Marcos F. Vidal Melo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 68 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 71 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#644,435
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#185
of 6,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,229
of 366,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#2
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.