You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Initial evidence to validate an instructional design-derived evaluation scale in higher education programs
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41239-016-0007-0 |
Authors |
Tania Moreira-Mora, Julia Espinoza-Guzmán |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 15% |
Spain | 3 | 15% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 5% |
Iraq | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Fiji | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 32% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 17 | 23% |
Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 22% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,072,441
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#147
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,448
of 303,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.