↓ Skip to main content

LOC283731 promoter hypermethylation prognosticates survival after radiochemotherapy in IDH1 wild‐type glioblastoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LOC283731 promoter hypermethylation prognosticates survival after radiochemotherapy in IDH1 wild‐type glioblastoma patients
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/ijc.30069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Mock, Christoph Geisenberger, Christian Orlik, Rolf Warta, Christian Schwager, Christine Jungk, Céline Dutruel, Lea Geiselhart, Dieter Weichenhan, Manuela Zucknick, Ann‐Katrin Nied, Sara Friauf, Janina Exner, David Capper, Christian Hartmann, Bernd Lahrmann, Niels Grabe, Jürgen Debus, Andreas von Deimling, Odilia Popanda, Christoph Plass, Andreas Unterberg, Amir Abdollahi, Peter Schmezer, Christel Herold‐Mende

Abstract

MGMT promoter methylation status is currently the only established molecular prognosticator in IDH wild-type glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Therefore, we aimed to discover novel therapy-associated epigenetic biomarkers. After enrichment for hypermethylated fractions using Methyl-CpG-Immunoprecipitation (MCIp), we performed global DNA methylation profiling for 14 long-term (LTS; >36 months) and 15 short-term (STS; 6-10 months) surviving GBM patients. Even after exclusion of the G-CIMP phenotype, we observed marked differences between the LTS and STS methylome. 1247 probes in 706 genes were hypermethylated in LTS and 463 probes in 305 genes were found to be hypermethylated in STS patients (p-value<0.05, log2 fold-change±0.5). We identified 13 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) with a minimum of 4 differentially methylated probes per gene. Indeed, we were able to validate a subset of these DMRs through a second, independent method (MassARRAY) in our LTS/STS training set (ADCY1, GPC3, LOC283731/ISLR2). These DMRs were further assessed for their prognostic capability in an independent validation cohort (n=62) of non-G-CIMP GBMs from the TCGA. Hypermethylation of multiple CpGs mapping to the promoter region of LOC283731 correlated with improved patient outcome (p=0.03). The prognostic performance of LOC283731 promoter hypermethylation was confirmed in a third independent study cohort (n=89), and was independent of gender, performance (KPS) and MGMT status (p=0.0485, HR=0.63). Intriguingly, the prediction was most pronounced in younger GBM patients (<60 years). In conclusion, we provide compelling evidence that promoter methylation status of this novel gene is a prognostic biomarker in IDH1 wild-type/non-G-CIMP GBMs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,098,054
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#9,563
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,268
of 305,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#58
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.