↓ Skip to main content

High quality draft genomes of the Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides challenge strains Afadé and B237

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High quality draft genomes of the Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides challenge strains Afadé and B237
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40793-015-0067-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Fischer, Ivette Santana-Cruz, Jan Hegerman, Hadrien Gourlé, Elise Schieck, Mathieu Lambert, Suvarna Nadendla, Hezron Wesonga, Rachel A. Miller, Sanjay Vashee, Johann Weber, Jochen Meens, Joachim Frey, Joerg Jores

Abstract

Members of the Mycoplasma mycoides cluster' represent important livestock pathogens worldwide. Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides is the etiologic agent of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia (CBPP), which is still endemic in many parts of Africa. We report the genome sequences and annotation of two frequently used challenge strains of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides, Afadé and B237. The information provided will enable downstream 'omics' applications such as proteomics, transcriptomics and reverse vaccinology approaches. Despite the absence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae like cyto-adhesion encoding genes, the two strains showed the presence of protrusions. This phenotype is likely encoded by another set of genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#477
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,668
of 295,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.