You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An apical hypoxic niche sets the pace of shoot meristem activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1203-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daan A. Weits, Alicja B. Kunkowska, Nicholas C. W. Kamps, Katharina M. S. Portz, Niko K. Packbier, Zoe Nemec Venza, Christophe Gaillochet, Jan U. Lohmann, Ole Pedersen, Joost T. van Dongen, Francesco Licausi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 13 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 10% |
| Italy | 7 | 7% |
| United States | 6 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Austria | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 53 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 48 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 23% |
| Researcher | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 70 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2021.
All research outputs
#413,650
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,169
of 98,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,787
of 368,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#456
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.