You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differential Pathogenesis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes Involving Sequence Mutations, Copy Number, Chromosomal Instability, and Methylation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D. Wilkerson, Xiaoying Yin, Vonn Walter, Ni Zhao, Christopher R. Cabanski, Michele C. Hayward, C. Ryan Miller, Mark A. Socinski, Alden M. Parsons, Leigh B. Thorne, Benjamin E. Haithcock, Nirmal K. Veeramachaneni, William K. Funkhouser, Scott H. Randell, Philip S. Bernard, Charles M. Perou, D. Neil Hayes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,597,298
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,188
of 210,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,019
of 167,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#745
of 3,804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.