↓ Skip to main content

Differential Specificity of Endocrine FGF19 and FGF21 to FGFR1 and FGFR4 in Complex with KLB

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Specificity of Endocrine FGF19 and FGF21 to FGFR1 and FGFR4 in Complex with KLB
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chaofeng Yang, Chengliu Jin, Xiaokun Li, Fen Wang, Wallace L. McKeehan, Yongde Luo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,035
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,684
of 175,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,550
of 3,726 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,726 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.