↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study of Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers of Early Stage Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
354 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Pilot Study of Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers of Early Stage Breast Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua Zhao, Jie Shen, Leonard Medico, Dan Wang, Christine B. Ambrosone, Song Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 3 1%
India 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 225 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 22%
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 20 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 30 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,711,393
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,481
of 194,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,982
of 99,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#365
of 954 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 954 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.