↓ Skip to main content

Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing the Non-Tandem Repeat Regions of the Human Mucin MUC4 in Pancreatic Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing the Non-Tandem Repeat Regions of the Human Mucin MUC4 in Pancreatic Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maneesh Jain, Ganesh Venkatraman, Nicolas Moniaux, Sukhwinder Kaur, Sushil Kumar, Subhankar Chakraborty, Grish C. Varshney, Surinder K. Batra

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 24%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,834,195
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,188
of 199,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,188
of 125,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#660
of 2,478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.