You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in the Tumor Microenvironment between African-American and European-American Breast Cancer Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damali N. Martin, Brenda J. Boersma, Ming Yi, Mark Reimers, Tiffany M. Howe, Harry G. Yfantis, Yien Che Tsai, Erica H. Williams, Dong H. Lee, Robert M. Stephens, Allan M. Weissman, Stefan Ambs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#540,383
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,691
of 194,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,142
of 94,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#28
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.