20,682 followers
@drdevangm And ambiguous - no? https://t.co/ktrU7ewCP7
@drdevangm And ambiguous - no? https://t.co/ktrU7ewCP7
It's nice to see that @DanGraur and my 2011 proposal for choosing forward strands is used by Ensembl. https://t.co/pCuPEl0YX8 https://t.co/fDyqURWf6J
@nobolly That's a good question - and maybe we should reconsider referring to the Watson and Crick strands of DNA ... https://t.co/rvXUtXhYaY
@surt_lab @JeffreyMaloy @Ilovepigenetics forgive the bump in but assume you've seen this from Cartwright and Gaur https://t.co/cwxO6fSQA7 pax