↓ Skip to main content

L1TD1 Is a Marker for Undifferentiated Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
L1TD1 Is a Marker for Undifferentiated Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond Ching-Bong Wong, Abel Ibrahim, Helen Fong, Noelle Thompson, Leslie F. Lock, Peter J. Donovan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Zimbabwe 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Computer Science 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,035
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,460
of 126,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#804
of 1,584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.