↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6)
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5545-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koen P. Rovers, Checca Bakkers, Geert A. A. M. Simkens, Jacobus W. A. Burger, Simon W. Nienhuijs, Geert-Jan M. Creemers, Anna M. J. Thijs, Alexandra R. M. Brandt-Kerkhof, Eva V. E. Madsen, Ninos Ayez, Nadine L. de Boer, Esther van Meerten, Jurriaan B. Tuynman, Miranda Kusters, Nina R. Sluiter, Henk M. W. Verheul, Hans J. van der Vliet, Marinus J. Wiezer, Djamila Boerma, Emma C. E. Wassenaar, Maartje Los, Cornelis B. Hunting, Arend G. J. Aalbers, Niels F. M. Kok, Koert F. D. Kuhlmann, Henk Boot, Myriam Chalabi, Schelto Kruijff, Lukas B. Been, Robert J. van Ginkel, Derk Jan A. de Groot, Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Andreas J. A. Bremers, Philip R. de Reuver, Sandra A. Radema, Karin H. Herbschleb, Wilhelmina M. U. van Grevenstein, Arjen J. Witkamp, Miriam Koopman, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Eino B. van Duyn, Walter J. B. Mastboom, Leonie J. M. Mekenkamp, Joost Nederend, Max J. Lahaye, Petur Snaebjornsson, Cornelis Verhoef, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Jeanette M. Bouma, Onno Kranenburg, Iris van ‘t Erve, Remond J. A. Fijneman, Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf, Patrick H. J. Hemmer, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Pieter J. Tanis, Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,916,409
of 16,535,594 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#696
of 6,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,801
of 270,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,535,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them