↓ Skip to main content

Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012855.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Machmutow, Ramona Meister, Alessa Jansen, Levente Kriston, Birgit Watzke, Martin Christian Härter, Sarah Liebherz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 18 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,203,784
of 14,414,290 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,475
of 10,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,285
of 261,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,414,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.