↓ Skip to main content

A comparative analysis of common methods to identify waterbird hotspots

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative analysis of common methods to identify waterbird hotspots
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.13209
Authors

Allison L. Sussman, Beth Gardner, Evan M. Adams, Leo Salas, Kevin P. Kenow, David R. Luukkonen, Michael J. Monfils, William P. Mueller, Kathryn A. Williams, Michele Leduc‐Lapierre, Elise F. Zipkin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 45%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Environmental Science 7 35%
Mathematics 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#278,782
of 13,644,932 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#96
of 1,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,816
of 251,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.