You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Flickr image quality evaluation by deeply fusing heterogeneous visual cues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Multimedia Tools and Applications, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11042-017-5372-8 |
| Authors |
Yongjun Zheng, Weiyu Di, Shen Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,357,610
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#81
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,592
of 444,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.