You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional Profiling of Live Melanoma Samples Using a Novel Automated Platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0052760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Schayowitz, Greg Bertenshaw, Emiko Jeffries, Timothy Schatz, James Cotton, Jessie Villanueva, Meenhard Herlyn, Clemens Krepler, Adina Vultur, Wei Xu, Gordon H. Yu, Lynn Schuchter, Douglas P. Clark |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 22% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 28% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,287,845
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,182
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,782
of 280,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#632
of 4,808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.