↓ Skip to main content

子どもの頃の読書が成人の意識・意欲・行動に与える影響

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Reading, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
子どもの頃の読書が成人の意識・意欲・行動に与える影響
Published in
The Science of Reading, March 2016
DOI 10.19011/sor.58.1_29
Authors

濵田 秀行, 秋田 喜代美, 藤森 裕治, 八木 雄一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,180,321
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Reading
#1
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,177
of 312,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Reading
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them