↓ Skip to main content

Gene and Base Editing as a Therapeutic Option for Cystic Fibrosis—Learning from Other Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Genes, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene and Base Editing as a Therapeutic Option for Cystic Fibrosis—Learning from Other Diseases
Published in
Genes, May 2019
DOI 10.3390/genes10050387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Mention, Lúcia Santos, Patrick T. Harrison

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 20%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 32 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 34 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,304,180
of 20,553,550 outputs
Outputs from Genes
#284
of 4,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,439
of 286,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,553,550 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.