You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The relevance of non-human primate and rodent malaria models for humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Langhorne, Pierre Buffet, Mary Galinski, Michael Good, John Harty, Didier Leroy, Maria M Mota, Erica Pasini, Laurent Renia, Eleanor Riley, Monique Stins, Patrick Duffy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 186 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 21% |
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,313,158
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,334
of 5,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,223
of 183,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#37
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.