↓ Skip to main content

The relevance of non-human primate and rodent malaria models for humans

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relevance of non-human primate and rodent malaria models for humans
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Langhorne, Pierre Buffet, Mary Galinski, Michael Good, John Harty, Didier Leroy, Maria M Mota, Erica Pasini, Laurent Renia, Eleanor Riley, Monique Stins, Patrick Duffy

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 150 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 12 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 14 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#11,063,779
of 12,445,334 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,368
of 3,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,230
of 273,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#184
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,445,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.