You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome–lamina interactions are established de novo in the early mouse embryo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1233-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Máté Borsos, Sara M. Perricone, Tamás Schauer, Julien Pontabry, Kim L. de Luca, Sandra S. de Vries, Elias R. Ruiz-Morales, Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla, Jop Kind |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 12% |
| Germany | 7 | 8% |
| France | 6 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 52% |
| Scientists | 42 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 113 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 66 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#387,353
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#19,380
of 98,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,086
of 364,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#429
of 1,023 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,023 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.