↓ Skip to main content

Discovery of Novel MicroRNAs in Female Reproductive Tract Using Next Generation Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery of Novel MicroRNAs in Female Reproductive Tract Using Next Generation Sequencing
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chad J. Creighton, Ashley L. Benham, Huifeng Zhu, Mahjabeen F. Khan, Jeffrey G. Reid, Ankur K. Nagaraja, Michael D. Fountain, Olivia Dziadek, Derek Han, Lang Ma, Jong Kim, Shannon M. Hawkins, Matthew L. Anderson, Martin M. Matzuk, Preethi H. Gunaratne

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that mediate post-transcriptional gene silencing. Over 700 human miRNAs have currently been identified, many of which are mutated or de-regulated in diseases. Here we report the identification of novel miRNAs through deep sequencing the small RNAome (<30 nt) of over 100 tissues or cell lines derived from human female reproductive organs in both normal and disease states. These specimens include ovarian epithelium and ovarian cancer, endometrium and endometriomas, and uterine myometrium and uterine smooth muscle tumors. Sequence reads not aligning with known miRNAs were each mapped to the genome to extract flanking sequences. These extended sequence regions were folded in silico to identify RNA hairpins. Sequences demonstrating the ability to form a stem loop structure with low minimum free energy (<-25 kcal) and predicted Drosha and Dicer cut sites yielding a mature miRNA sequence matching the actual sequence were considered putative novel miRNAs. Additional confidence was achieved when putative novel hairpins assembled a collection of sequences highly similar to the putative mature miRNA but with heterogeneous 3'-ends. A confirmed novel miRNA fulfilled these criteria and had its "star" sequence in our collection. We found 7 distinct confirmed novel miRNAs, and 51 additional novel miRNAs that represented highly confident predictions but without detectable star sequences. Our novel miRNAs were detectable in multiple samples, but expressed at low levels and not specific to any one tissue or cell type. To date, this study represents the largest set of samples analyzed together to identify novel miRNAs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
France 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 118 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 26%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Computer Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,283,299
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,182
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,906
of 93,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#174
of 666 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 666 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.