↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailored text-message programme (MiQuit) for smoking cessation in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailored text-message programme (MiQuit) for smoking cessation in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and meta-analysis
Published in
Trials, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3341-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Whitemore, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Felix Naughton, Stephen Sutton, Sue Cooper, Steve Parrott, Catherine Hewitt, Miranda Clark, Michael Ussher, Matthew Jones, David Torgerson, Tim Coleman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Psychology 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,839,955
of 15,147,785 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,482
of 3,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,721
of 264,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,147,785 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them