↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
80 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008388.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Fiona J Rowe, Sven Jonuscheit, Ashleigh Kernohan, Jayne Angilley, Clair A Henderson, Peter Langhorne, Pauline Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 29 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Psychology 7 9%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#295,821
of 13,751,936 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#762
of 10,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,303
of 253,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,751,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.