You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a Rigorous Assessment of Systems Biology Models: The DREAM3 Challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009202 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert J. Prill, Daniel Marbach, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Peter K. Sorger, Leonidas G. Alexopoulos, Xiaowei Xue, Neil D. Clarke, Gregoire Altan-Bonnet, Gustavo Stolovitzky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 31% |
| Researcher | 69 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 37% |
| Computer Science | 47 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 10% |
| Engineering | 26 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,445,779
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#155,100
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,877
of 93,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#605
of 667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.