↓ Skip to main content

Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide-treated nets
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012688.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Choi, Joseph Pryce, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 34%
Unspecified 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 14 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#925,136
of 13,698,878 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,835
of 10,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,680
of 252,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,698,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.