You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early recognition of the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) pneumonia by chest ultrasound
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11201 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Americo Testa, Gino Soldati, Roberto Copetti, Rosangela Giannuzzi, Grazia Portale, Nicolò Gentiloni-Silveri |
Abstract |
The clinical picture of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1)v ranges from a self-limiting afebrile infection to a rapidly progressive pneumonia. Prompt diagnosis and well-timed treatment are recommended. Chest radiography (CRx) often fails to detect the early interstitial stage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of bedside chest ultrasonography (US) in the early management of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1)v infection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
Other | 37 | 25% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 36 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,632,003
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,293
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,342
of 169,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.