↓ Skip to main content

Land- and water-based exercise intervention in women with fibromyalgia: the al-andalus physical activity randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land- and water-based exercise intervention in women with fibromyalgia: the al-andalus physical activity randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Carbonell-Baeza, Jonatan R Ruiz, Virginia A Aparicio, Francisco B Ortega, Diego Munguía-Izquierdo, Inmaculada C Álvarez-Gallardo, Víctor Segura-Jiménez, Daniel Camiletti-Moirón, Alejandro Romero, Fernando Estévez-López, Blanca Samos, Antonio J Casimiro, Ángela Sierra, Pedro A Latorre, Manuel Pulido-Martos, Pedro Femia, Isaac J Pérez-López, Palma Chillón, María J Girela-Rejón, Pablo Tercedor, Alejandro Lucía, Manuel Delgado-Fernández

Abstract

The al-Andalus physical activity intervention study is a randomised control trial to investigate the effectiveness of a land- and water-based exercise intervention for reducing the overall impact of fibromyalgia (primary outcome), and for improving tenderness and pain-related measures, body composition, functional capacity, physical activity and sedentary behaviour, fatigue, sleep quality, health-related quality of life, and cognitive function (secondary outcomes) in women with fibromyalgia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 226 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Unspecified 27 11%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 78 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 24%
Sports and Recreations 46 19%
Unspecified 39 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Psychology 21 9%
Other 45 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2012.
All research outputs
#7,459,436
of 12,373,620 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,418
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,949
of 116,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.