You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cerenkov Radiation Energy Transfer (CRET) Imaging: A Novel Method for Optical Imaging of PET Isotopes in Biological Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013300 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin S. Dothager, Reece J. Goiffon, Erin Jackson, Scott Harpstrite, David Piwnica-Worms |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 105 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 28% |
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,283,299
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,182
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,442
of 99,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#241
of 879 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 879 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.