You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stress-induced tunneling nanotubes support treatment adaptation in prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-44346-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Kretschmer, Fan Zhang, Syam Prakash Somasekharan, Charan Tse, Lauren Leachman, Anna Gleave, Brian Li, Ivan Asmaro, Teresa Huang, Leszek Kotula, Poul H. Sorensen, Martin E. Gleave |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,619,742
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#38,294
of 127,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,563
of 351,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,015
of 3,069 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,069 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.