↓ Skip to main content

Routine HIV Screening in France: Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine HIV Screening in France: Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Caroline E. Sloan, Cécile Charlois-Ou, Stéphane Le Vu, Caroline Semaille, Dominique Costagliola, Josiane Pillonel, Anne-Isabelle Poullié, Olivier Scemama, Sylvie Deuffic-Burban, Elena Losina, Rochelle P. Walensky, Kenneth A. Freedberg, A. David Paltiel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 21 17%
Other 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,148
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,783
of 110,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#533
of 954 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 954 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.