You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unexpected High Losses of Anopheles gambiae Larvae Due to Rainfall
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krijn P. Paaijmans, Moses O. Wandago, Andrew K. Githeko, Willem Takken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 21% |
| Researcher | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 6% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2012.
All research outputs
#13,662,852
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,408
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,055
of 77,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#174
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.