You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High- and Low-Affinity Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Ligand Interactions Activate Distinct Signaling Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0015945 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan A. Krall, Elsa M. Beyer, Gavin MacBeath |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 28% |
| Researcher | 39 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,378,542
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,277
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,400
of 181,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#230
of 1,209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.