↓ Skip to main content

Differential Volatile Signatures from Skin, Naevi and Melanoma: A Novel Approach to Detect a Pathological Process

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Volatile Signatures from Skin, Naevi and Melanoma: A Novel Approach to Detect a Pathological Process
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatjana Abaffy, Robert Duncan, Daniel D. Riemer, Olaf Tietje, George Elgart, Clara Milikowski, R. Anthony DeFazio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 27 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Engineering 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,115
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,022
of 100,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#548
of 972 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 972 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.