You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Model-Based Design of Growth-Attenuated Viruses
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kwang-il Lim, Tobias Lang, Vy Lam, John Yin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Professor | 4 | 27% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 33% |
Engineering | 3 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,638
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,681
of 89,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.