You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung Cancer Mortality (1950–1999) among Eldorado Uranium Workers: A Comparison of Models of Carcinogenesis and Empirical Excess Risk Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041431 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Eidemüller, Peter Jacob, Rachel S. D. Lane, Stanley E. Frost, Lydia B. Zablotska |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,289,031
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,648
of 213,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,745
of 175,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#713
of 4,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.