You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/ejhf.1531 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Petar M. Seferovic, Piotr Ponikowski, Stefan D. Anker, Johann Bauersachs, Ovidiu Chioncel, John G.F. Cleland, Rudolf A. de Boer, Heinz Drexel, Tuvia Ben Gal, Loreena Hill, Tiny Jaarsma, Ewa A. Jankowska, Markus S. Anker, Mitja Lainscak, Basil S. Lewis, Theresa McDonagh, Marco Metra, Davor Milicic, Wilfried Mullens, Massimo F. Piepoli, Giuseppe Rosano, Frank Ruschitzka, Maurizio Volterrani, Adriaan A. Voors, Gerasimos Filippatos, Andrew J.S. Coats |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 59 | 20% |
United States | 20 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 14 | 5% |
Mexico | 13 | 4% |
Colombia | 12 | 4% |
Argentina | 9 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 9 | 3% |
Canada | 8 | 3% |
Chile | 4 | 1% |
Other | 43 | 14% |
Unknown | 111 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 202 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 17% |
Scientists | 38 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 662 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 62 | 9% |
Other | 61 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 54 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 44 | 7% |
Other | 146 | 22% |
Unknown | 243 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 274 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 48 | 7% |
Unknown | 266 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#123,420
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#20
of 2,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,307
of 352,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.