↓ Skip to main content

Smart Specialisation: what gets lost in translation from concept to practice?

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
77 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smart Specialisation: what gets lost in translation from concept to practice?
Published in
Regional Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
Authors

Carlo Gianelle, Fabrizio Guzzo, Krzysztof Mieszkowski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 36%
Social Sciences 8 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#381,933
of 15,481,906 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#19
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,650
of 266,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,481,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.